Use
highlighters - Take
note of any and all points of interest in the text. If
you've got a thesis in mind already, use several different
colors of highlighter, each for information relevant
to a separate prong of your argument. This will make
your life much easier when you go back to integrate your
sources, particularly if you've got an extensive amount
of text to cover.
Look for patterns
- Be aware of recurring techniques-both literary
and rhetorical-which the author uses to illustrate a
concept. Specific sorts of imagery, allusion, or dialogue,
which seem to be similar or related inevitably, reveal
a larger intention that can be made into an argument.
Ask
questions - In
expository work, continually ask yourself "Is
this true? What evidence supports this statement? Can
other conclusions be drawn from the facts of this text?" By
deciding whether or not you agree with the arguments
of your source, you'll begin to crystallize more subtle
arguments of your own. In literature, question the author's
purpose in using particular narrative structures. "Why
is this metaphor used? What does the comparison signify?
Why do we learn this particular piece of information
in such a manner? Why is the setting dwelled on so much
in this passage? What is the relationship between setting
and character?” Write these questions in the margins
as you go along.
Get down to the details
- One of the most sophisticated close reading techniques
you can incorporate into your work is an analysis of
the multiple connotations of a specific word. Be aware
of every single word the author uses. When you find one
of particular interest, literally look it up in the dictionary
and consider how each and every definition might be applied
to the text. Even if the author uses it with one literal
definition in mind, see if the connotations of the other
definitions can be applied to your idea (This is particularly
true of Shakespeare).
Consider
the source in relation to other texts - If
something in the work reminds you of something else you've
read, there's quite possibly a good reason why. Consider
how your source is a response to or a continuation of
other texts. Always be on the look out for Christ symbolism
and Greek mythological allusions; both are fairly easy
to spot and can be effectively analyzed in support of
a particular interpretation.
An Example:
From
Coleridge's Kubla Kahn: "In Xanadu
did Kubla Kahn a pleasure dome decree; Where Alph the
sacred river ran through caverns measureless to man;
into a sunless sea."
Your
assignment is to write about how the poem illustrates
the power of human creativity. In light of this, here
are some questions to ask yourself right off the bat:
-
Why
does Coleridge select an Oriental locale and a historical
figure to open his work?
-
What
is the significance of the word "pleasure," "measureless," "sunless"?
-
What
is Alph, and does Coleridge use it as the setting
for his poem?
Answering
these questions might involve a consideration of distance,
in both time and space, related to the vastness of human
capacity. You might also consider "measureless" and "sunless" as
descriptive of types of knowledge or ignorance; in breaching
the "sunless" sea with his dome, what
sort of power is Kubla Kahn exhibiting? A trip to the
dictionary (or, more likely, a glance at the inevitable
foot note) will provide the information that the
Alph is a magical river in mythology. This begs the question, "how
does a fantastic setting relate to Coleridge's view of
the imagination?”