Lesson
Four: Issue-based Essays
| The Admissions Essay Prep Leader shares essay
writing strategies and samples that will help you
gain entrance to your first choice law school. For
more free essay writing advice and for help with
your admissions essay, visit EssayEdge.com. |

|
 |
| Law
School Statement Strategies |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Issue-based
Essays
Issues-based
essays come in many different forms. The best kind of issues-based
essays are written by applicants who have a strong passion
for a specific cause and can show why the cause is important
to them and what actions they have taken to further it. If
there is an issue that dominates your thoughts, studies,
or activities, it is natural that this issue will also dominate
your essay.
This
applicant, for example, begins: "I am
an activist with a commitment to fighting for progressive
causes through legislation, policy, and grassroots organizing." She
continues to demonstrate that she has been an active
advocate for citizens' right to sexuality education and
health care on many fronts.
This
applicant also writes about a single issue
but does not focus on her own political activity. Rather,
she uses the essay to argue against the injustice that
currently exists in the court system regarding the issue
of gay rights. She then relates her points to her motivation
in the last sentence with:
Through
obtaining a law degree, I hope to join many others in the
struggle for our rights and dignity, and strive within
an imperfect court system toward the goal of greater equality
within the law.
Other issues-based
essays focus more on analyzing all sides of the issue rather
than taking a stand from one viewpoint. If you do this type
of essay well, it will show the committee that you are a
person of reason and logic who can make mature, educated
decisions based on a thorough analysis of issues. It is not
even necessary that you come to any final conclusions-just
showing that you can see and analyze all sides of an argument
has validity.
This
applicant, for example, analyzes the issue
of Latin American labor laws. She offers a nonstandard
viewpoint based on her first-hand experience in the Peace
Corps, but acknowledges the other side of the argument
as well, without coming to any final conclusion:
How to
balance these positive factors with the often exploitative
and abusive methods of the factory managers, or how to
control the problems of rural-urban migration are questions
I am still investigating.
The pitfall
inherent in any of the above issues-based approaches is that
applicants who write about their commitment to a social justice
issue without backing it up with real evidence or experience
risk appearing insincere. One admissions officer had this
comment:
Year
after year hundreds of applicants swear by their altruistic
motives, yet only 2% of all lawyers graduating in 1991
took jobs in the public sector, protecting the environment,
fighting racial inequality, and crusading for rights
for the homeless. The majority (over 60%) took jobs in
private firms. After a time, you become skeptical.
If your
beliefs are genuine, you will be able to support them with
clear evidence of your involvement in activities that demonstrate
your commitment.
Sample
Essay
Note:
This essay appears unedited for instructional purposes.
Essays edited by EssayEdge are substantially improved.
For samples of EssayEdge editing, please click
here.
I am an
activist with a commitment to fighting for progressive causes
through legislation, policy, and grassroots organizing. While
I have participated in many varied projects from editing
a sexuality education curriculum to campaigning for gay rights
as a local boardmember of [the statewide gay rights organization],
I am most concerned with reproductive health issues. In this
statement I will explain how I gained expertise in this field
through both academic and professional work from 1988 to
the present. Through this work I have acquired the intellectual
foundation and the concrete experience to be an effective
advocate for citizens' right to sexuality education and health
care.
At [school]
I began my commitment to reproductive health. I earned the
right to design my own major in women's studies and legal
issues, for which I took courses in feminism and wrote on
the developing legal precedent recognizing fetal rights.
During my year at [school] I studied the impact the abortion
pill RU 486 might have on the National Health Service, researched
the evolving debate about the drug in the European press,
and presented my findings at a Women's Studies Department
seminar upon my return to the U.S. In my senior thesis on
the legal treatment of pregnant substance abusers, I addressed
the difficulties associated with prosecuting these women
and proposed alternative approaches.
While I
was a student, I gained professional experience as a birth
control counselor at the University health clinic. I also
worked as a Planned Parenthood educator, for which I edited
a sexuality education curriculum and designed and taught
community programs on contraception, AIDS, puberty, and sexual
abuse prevention.
When I
moved to a small desert town in the Western United States,
I volunteered for a democratic congressional campaign, where
I briefed the candidate on abortion rights and sexuality
issues in health care reform. I met the executive director
of the regional Planned Parenthood, and convinced her to
hire me as the agency's first Director of Public Affairs.
I coordinated grassroots lobbying efforts on pending legislation
including the state's health care reform bill, clinic access
bill, and anti-gay rights legislation.
I quickly
learned that this small town was far more conservative than
my university's eastern college community. Many of Planned
Parenthood's efforts to promote sexuality education were
thwarted. I decided to discover who opposed the agency and
what their tactics were. My research uncovered a network
of local activists, some of whom had connections to state
and nation-wide Conservative organizations. I attended many
meetings and followed public right-wing activity such as
the campaign to teach creationism in our local schools. I
published my findings in an op-ed piece for our local paper,
and as a front page article for a west-coast human rights
newsletter. I have enclosed copies of these publications
for you.
When my
State Senator asked me to manage his reelection campaign,
I eagerly accepted since I knew he had worked hard in support
of health care and civil rights. The position also offered
me greater professional responsibility. Even though we lost
the election, the campaign was an invaluable lesson in creating
an effective political message, managing hundreds of volunteers,
working in coalition with other campaigns, designing advertising,
and fundraising.
I had hoped
to work in the state capitol after the campaign, and I am
now working for a state level health care advocacy organization
which employs a lobbyist and coordinates grassroots strategy.
In my new position I am researching legislation, helping
the director design lobbying strategies, and keeping affiliated
organizations throughout the state informed about evolving
policy and bills.
While I
believe that I have developed both academic and professional
expertise in reproductive health policy, health care reform,
and political organizing, I would like to acquire the skills
and power to make a bigger difference. Law school would provide
me with the technical skills and professional influence to
be more effective in confronting right-wing litigation and
initiatives and in designing and advocating for progressive
social policy. After law school, I envision working for a
non-profit organization such as the ACLU Reproductive Freedom
Project, or working in government drafting and analyzing
reproductive health policy and legislation.
Sample
Essay
Note:
This essay appears unedited for instructional purposes.
Essays edited by EssayEdge are substantially improved.
For samples of EssayEdge editing, please click
here.
In December
of 1988, Texas state District Court Judge Jack Hampton sentenced
a man convicted of double homicide to a term of thirty years.
After the hearing, Judge Hampton explained the light sentence
with the statement "I don't care much for queers cruising
the streets picking up teenage boys. I put prostitutes and
gays at about the same level. If these boys had picked up
two prostitutes and taken them to the woods and killed them,
I'd consider that a similar case. And I'd be hard put to
give somebody life for killing a prostitute."
Ideally,
the American judicial system provides equal treatment to
all parties. After working in the New York City jail system
and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, however, I
am dismayed by the disparity between ideology and reality.
The court system which should treat all individuals equally
consistently falls short of this goal.
Because
of various biases which exist within the court system, and
within society as a whole, gays and lesbians in this country
have historically been neglected or even persecuted by the
law. In many ways, this neglect can be attributed to the
social construct of the "closet." Because homosexuals
in this country have been forced by society and the courts
to suppress their own identities, their places within society
are undermined. When gays and lesbians are told by society
that they have a "lifestyle" rather than lives,
and that this "chosen" lifestyle is abnormal and
unacceptable, then they have been effectively forced out
of society. Since the court system fails to address issues
of discrimination in employment and housing, and neglects
to punish perpetrators of hate crimes, gays and lesbians
lose the one recourse which is supposedly guaranteed to all
individuals. Justice Warren Burger writes in the Bowers v.
Hardwick, 1986 decision, "condemnation of those practices
[homosexual sodomy] is firmly rooted in Judaeo-Christian
moral and ethical standards...To hold that the act of homosexual
sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would
be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching." When
the highest court in the country condones the use of sexual
orientation as a means to marginalize individuals, and people
must conceal their identity to avoid societal discrimination,
then gays and lesbians have truly lost their identities.
Although
the judicial system has made progress in correcting its ills,
it is impossible to deny that inequality in the application
of justice still exists. As an individual considering a career
in the law, I have a responsibility to recognize the disparity
between ideology and reality, and to condemn it. Through
obtaining a law degree, I hope to join many others in the
struggle for our rights and dignity, and strive within an
imperfect court system toward the goal of greater equality
within the law.
Sample
Essay
Note:
This essay appears unedited for instructional purposes.
Essays edited by EssayEdge are substantially improved.
For samples of EssayEdge editing, please click
here.
After college
I served for two and a half years in Honduras with the U.S.
Peace Corps. During my time there I worked on several development
projects. My experiences left me with mixed feelings about
development and what is realistically achievable. Projects
often proved only thin band-aids against larger endemic problems.
I found potential for changing some of the larger problems
of development in a surprising arena, maquiladoras, or textile
factories.
While in
Honduras, I talked to many women who worked in maquiladoras.
Unlike what I had read in classes, these women were happy
to have their jobs and suffered no health problems or abuse.
They earned more money working in the factories in the cities
than picking coffee in the mountains. Women could leave their
homes and find work without having to depend on husbands
or families to survive.
The factory
jobs had other positive side effects. I saw wealthy families
driving to the countryside to find maids because all the
city maids quit to work in the factories where they earned
more. Wages for domestic workers had already risen and these
families were trying to avoid paying an even higher salary.
Also, factories required a sixth grade degree. This, if nothing
else, could motivate an illiterate farmer to keep his daughters
in school.
How to
balance these positive factors with the often exploitative
and abusive methods of the factory managers, or how to control
the problems of rural-urban migration are questions I am
still investigating. However, economic opportunities outside
of the home, such as those in maquiladoras, could play a
key role in changing traditional attitudes that prevent women
from developing and using their full potential.
With the
new U.S. policy focus on trade with Latin America and with
more and more businesses using labor abroad, labor conditions
in maquiladoras will be a growing human rights issue. At
the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), I have been
able to write letters to the USTR pushing for the continued
review of the Generalized System of Preferences in Guatemala,
to the President of El Salvador to encourage the enforcement
of their labor codes, and lobbied for a labor petitioning
amendment to the Caribbean Basin Trade Security Act.
A law degree
would give me a tool to continue to work effectively and
realistically on this and other issues that contribute to
the well-being of people affected by U.S. policies and investments
in Latin America.
|